Nosefrida Hygiene Filters

Nosefrida Hygiene FiltersI bought these filters at the same time I bought the nosefrida (which is amazing btw). I wish I would have waited, because there was no need spend the $$$. The filters are essentially a piece of foam cut to fit the nosefrida. They do the job of preventing any snot from entering your mouth (gross). But after 3 months of using the nosefrida I have yet to find the need to change the filter that came with it. No matter how hard I try I can’t get the snot that far back. The filters do their job, but I don’t think you need these replacements.

The Nosefrida works so well on clearing my baby’s nose. It comes with spare filters, so you may want to wait to buy these.

Buy Nosefrida Hygiene Filters Now

I love our NoseFrida. You don’t really need to order these as the original NoseFrida comes with spares.

Read Best Reviews of Nosefrida Hygiene Filters Here

This thing seems like a nasty way to pull out the mucous, but trust me it works. I bought this because the bulb was giving my son bloody noses and made him howl. With the nosefrida I just spritz him with saline and then suck the snot out. He does not even cry, and it gets so much out that I am amazed he could have breathed with all that up there. He always breathes clear after I use it, and it is invaluable to me on those nights when he has a stuffed up nose and wakes himself up. I used to get up to soothe him every couple of hours on those nights… now I get the NoseFrida and he sleeps the rest of the night. It is amazing! I am buying this for every baby shower I go to from now on.

Want Nosefrida Hygiene Filters Discount?

I have the nosefrida and while I must say that it’s really safe for kids (doesn’t injure their nostrils) these replacement filters are expensive! You’re supposed to change the filters after each use to maintain hygiene but with my twins having to have their noses cleared at least twice a day, that’s 4 filters a day! What I do is use a filter per day and just rinse and airdry the filter after each use…

Save 30% Off

Bio-Oil PurCellin Oil Facial Treatment Products

Bio-oil 4.2ozI have lost ALOT of weight over the past year by seriously improving my eating habits, working out three times a week, and taking that Raspberry Ketones supplement for energy and more so to suppress my appetite. I lost 60 pounds which was great but my stretch marks actually got worse!

I have tried a few different products and found this to be one of the most effective for the price. I still use retinol cream on my face (Retinol Cream (Vitamin A) 2 oz. + FREE St. Ives Renewing Collagen Elastin Advanced Body Moisturizer Gift Set) as nothing else I’ve tried has been able to keep my skin as firm and healthy looking but for the rest of my body (especially my belly), Bio-oil is simply the best thing I’ve done for lessening the appearance of any stretch marks.

I noticed results within the first month, skin is much more smooth and firm. The stretch marks are not completely gone but I think within another month it should be history.

I bought this stuff and used up one bottle (lasted about 2 months). At first I used it on my face for hyper-pigmentation and scaring left over from acne and on parts of my body for stretch marks. I ended up getting several huge cystic nodules from it on my face. Also it made my face very greasy and constantly looked wet. So it wasn’t good for my face but I decided to keep trying it for stretch marks. I used it diligently for 2 months like it says on the bottle and took before and after pictures. There are no noticeable differences.

I do not want to recommend that people do not buy this product because it seems some people have had great results with it. I googled it and it turns out that bio-oil is made with mineral oil which is a petroleum based byproduct. I did some more digging and learned that contrary to popular belief Mineral oil is not comedogenic (pore clogging) but it does however produce a suffocation effect on your skin and makes it unable to absorb nutrients and to detoxify itself. Which pretty much renders the nutrients in this product useless. There are some pretty bad reviews out there for this stuff made by professionals. Now having said that I will admit that I am no doctor, and I like to think that the people who made this know more about this stuff then I do. After all there has to be something good about it if so many people have had positive results. My advice is sure go ahead and try it, why not. Its cheap. But I would suggest to only use it on your body NOT your face. That area is just too delicate and sensitive and I just wouldn’t risk it. Also do not forget to do a patch test first! I cannot stress this enough.

I had some success with fading stretch marks by using a microneedle roller or sometimes called a dermaroller. They are expensive but I bought one off of ebay pretty cheap. Then buy some non oil based and non-comedogenic nutrient serum (I’m currently using babyface products also sold on ebay). The roller and the serum combined has done wonders for me.

Buy Bio-Oil PurCellin Oil Facial Treatment Products Now

UPDATE 2: Bio-oil continued to work, and it actually helped the scar area look all the same when I got some sun on it this summer. I did find a picture of the original injury (it’s not for the squeamish, but it will show how long my original was. UPDATE: It has been a little over three weeks since I started using Bio-oil. In fact, I stopped using it four days ago to see if the positive results were only temporary. While I was using Bio-oil on the liver spots, not only did the spots fade, but other nearby spots (2.5 inches away) faded, too, even though they were not applied directly with Bio-oil. The spots came back after two days of not using Bio-oil, not as dark, as they were, but they did come back. My forehead scar has continued to disappear even after I stopped, so I am going to continue putting Bio-oil on it. Not only has the scar tissue turned from being reddish to now looking like the my regular skin color, the area of the scar which was a little higher is now decreasing to where I can hardly feel the any rise in the area. I will update this review in another 2-3 weeks, and try to take some pictures of the scar. The pictures I took three weeks ago didn’t show as much as it really looks like, but it did show the higher rise. I’ll post whatever the final pictures look like and compare them to the original wound (really bad looking) and those from three weeks ago, along with the final pictures in two weeks.

When I saw this product offered to “Vine” participants, I thought it would be one that my wife, who is a fair-skinned blond, could use. She applied it to a place on her arm for several days before I asked her about it. When I looked at her arm, I could immediately tell where she had used it for that area was smoother looking and even felt smoother.

This got me very interested in Bio-Oil, and I thought I’d use it on a scar on my head near my hairline and on a “liver” spot (or is it called an “age” spot?), and I have been very pleased with the results.

The scar is a little over two inches long in the shape of an “L,” and for the three years I’ve had it, almost an inch of it was still reddish and has looked like it was still healing. The doctor who treated me told me to put Neosporin on it, and it would heal without much of a scar. Well, he was wrong. Now, in the week that I have been using Bio-Oil, the red part of the scar has decreased in length to where it is only 1/4th of an inch in length. The liver spot on the back of my hand has decreased in color to where it is difficult to find.

Like one other reviewer, I am going to post a follow-up to this review in several weeks to let you know two things: 1) Did both areas, the scar and the liver spot, continue to improve, and 2) What happened once I stopped applying Bio-Oil, for it is one thing for a product to work, but it is even better if the product produced some sort of permanent result.

NOTE: The results are in. The liver spots came back after I stopped applying Bio-oil, but the scar stayed healed, and I am posting two pictures. I hate to say it, but after I got such great initial results, I didn’t apply Bio-oil on a regular basis, so your results with the liver (aging) spots may be better. Of the two pictures, one shows how the scar looked after the doctor treated it and had me use Neosporin. That picture was taken in 2005 after it had been healed for a year. The scar was still very visible and looked this way even three years later before I started using Bio-oil. The second picture was taken just a few days ago. I am pretty confident I could have had even better results, but I’m just not used to treating myself for anything for more than three weeks.

Read Best Reviews of Bio-Oil PurCellin Oil Facial Treatment Products Here

I had heard about this product when I was pregnant with my first child, but didn’t get a chance to use it. I used cocoa butter and baby oil, and I ended up with some pretty bad stretch marks. Now that I am pregnant with my second child, I decided that it might be beneficial to try to prevent getting any more if possible. Within 3 days of using this product, my magenta colored stretch marks have turned brownish and are fading significantly. It’s amazing! I wish I had thought to take pics. I have even used it on my face and it feels wonderful, as it absorbs very quickly. As a side-note, an old stitches scar on my palm is also diminishing because of the contact with the oil. I highly recommend this to anyone with small scars, wrinkles, crows-feet, or stretch marks. Great Product!

Want Bio-Oil PurCellin Oil Facial Treatment Products Discount?

I first tried Bio-Oil to see if it would diminish a scar on my upper lift that remained after skin cancer surgery in 12/08. I didn’t try it until mid-2009. My scar is still visible, but better than before.

However, that is not the reason I absolutely love Bio-Oil. First, let me state that I have oily skin on much of my face. . . and I’m no teenager. I tried using BioOil on my two dry areas (eyes and chin) and it immediately took the dryness away and lasted all day. I then put it ALL OVER my face one morning, let it set in for a couple of minutes, and was surprised that my face wasn’t oily from the BO. I tissued what was left off, put my mineral makeup on, and couldn’t believe that my face did not “oil up” the entire day as it normally would. Who would guess that? So, now it’s my daily ritual put BioOil on right after getting out of the shower and treat both my dry and oily skin at the same time with great results.

I’ve spent a fortune on high priced cosmetics and NEVER been as satisfied with any product as with this one.

Save 25% Off

Apple TV MD199LL/A

Apple TV MD199LL/A

  • 1080p HD programming, including iTunes movies and TV shows, Netflix, Vimeo, photos and more in HD
  • Access your purchased movies, TV shows, and music with iTunes Match right from iCloud
  • Stream video, games, and more from iOS devices using AirPlay; music, videos, and photos can also be streamed from PCs and Macs
  • HDMI and digital optical audio output; connects to network via Wireless-N or Ethernet
  • Comes with 7-button aluminum Apple remote; can be controlled by iPhone, iPad, and iPod touch via Remote app

I own both the new Apple TV (1080P/2012) model and the Roku2 XS. I found myself doing a side by side comparison of the two products and here are my findings.

AppleTV

Pros: Works out of the box, minimum effort to setup, really easy to use interface + wifi. Can Restream old purchased episodes. Netflix App much cleaner and more superb. Streaming and buffering causes no delays or degradation of picture. AirPlay makes up for a lot of the limited channels (with Mountain Lion the functionality goes up even more). iPad Remote easy to use

Cons: Limited Channels…needs an open API like Roku to build more channels

Roku2 XS

Pros: Many Channels available, Cheaper ($10), Free Movie Channels like Crackle, AmazonPrime availability, Vendor neutral. iPad Remote easy to use

Cons: Missing iTunes integration, Poor quality and buffering (constant downgrading the image quality on NBA League Pass and Netflix). User UI is just bland and could be cleaner. Bugs and issues. Most channels you have to pay extra for. Roku disconnects from my wifi network randomly whereas the AppleTV never does during side by side streaming. Setup takes longer and more tweaking needed by the user.

Summary:

While the Roku offers you many more channels the end user experience on the AppleTV makes it much more simple to utilize. If you have some form of Apple Eco System then the AppleTV is for you. If you hate Apple then the Roku is for you. Each product has their own advantages and disadvantages. For me in the end it was about the user experience and ease of using the player and the AppleTV edged out. It’s not to say I won’t be using my Roku but until there are some updates to fix some of the buffers and issues the AppleTV is by far the better product.

UPDATE: Completely Dropped my Roku in favor of Apple TV now. For some of the comments below I have a 30 Mbps down, 10 Mbps Up and being a network engineer and having quite an impressive armada of enterprise switches in the house I know it’s not the network but the Roku. It’s either the memory or the application code that keeps causing issues itself. Also for those that claim they cannot view movies due to apple protections…download airparrot and VLC. It works perfectly.

Buy Apple TV MD199LL/A Now

This is an elegant and easy to use little box. The interface is pretty, setup is dead simple (took less than 10 minutes from start to finish), and it’s fairly intuitive to use. The problem comes in that it doesn’t serve a great deal of function, at least for me.

Apple TV is essentially 3 main functions in one package. iTunes front end, content/channel provider, and wireless display.

On the face of it, Apple TV is a front end for iTunes and allows you to buy or rent content and view it on the box along with previously purchased content. The usefulness of this is based on where you buy content. If it’s not iTunes then you can ignore most of it. All the magic from this perspective is essentially gone for videos and even music doesn’t work without iTunes Match. You can alternatively access your media from another computer currently running iTunes, but only the content in iTunes (not a huge issue) and again, only when the computer is on and running (think of it like an iTunes extender). The interface is lush and a joy to use but it’s dependency on iTunes purchases or iTunes running on a computer diminishes the usefulness. It’d be nice it it could access a network attached storage or something similar.

The other content means are provided through channels/apps, like on a Roku box, but are limited to only 13. Missing are the normal heavy hitters: Hulu Plus, HBO Go, Pandora, Slacker, Spotify, etc. Only Netflix is present really, but what device doesn’t have access to that? I have 3 other devices connected to my receiver that can do it already and personally prefer the PS3 Interface. The general feel of the channel/apps is also very smooth and works fast but some of them feel a bit long in the tooth, as if it could be better but in order to fit the overall design scheme it’s not (again Netflix is an example).

The final feature is AirPlay. This is a feature that allows you to stream music and video from your MacOS and iOS device. There’s also AirPlay mirroring which takes what you see on your device (or computer once Mountain Lion is out) and puts it on the Apple TV. It seems, based on the packaging, Apple is trying to play this up a lot and I’d agree with that goal. It’s really simple and amazing to use where it works (certain applications don’t support it or actively block it). If you’re familiar with Intel’s WiDi it’s a very similar thing, especially with AirPlay mirroring. Certain things work better with Airplay though (Slingplayer and Netflix, for example, display the controls on iOS while the video is on the TV) and others not so well (Hulu, for example, doesn’t support video out only mirroring. HBOGo is blocked entirely, mirroring or video out). It works really well and is very smooth with minimal lag with audio and experiences only occasional minor choppiness with video provided you’re on 802.11N or have the apple tv wired (had bad problems with quality over two G routers). The same, however, can’t be said for AirPlay compatible games like Asphalt 6, which due to lag/stuttering is near unplayable (the jittering and stuttering mean you’ll miss too much with fast paced games, e.g. In Asphalt you’ll crash).

Your enjoyment of this device will depend directly on the amount you give yourself to Apple, more specifically iTunes. If you don’t use iTunes for content purchase at least 1/3 of the functionality is right out the window. And if you own a PS3, Xbox, TiVo, Wii, Roku, Google TV, certain Blu-Ray players, or even a smart TV then there’s no point to the channels/apps really. No MacOS or iOS devices and there’s no point to the AirPlay aspect. However if you’re a diehard Apple fan and have lots of money spent in iTunes, this will be amazing, I’m sure of it.

That’s not to say it’s not without its pleasure, the device is a joy to use. I find myself wanting to listen to music from my TV just to look at the lush interface that’s so simple and yet gorgeous. But, for all of Apple’s shine and improvements to the device, they’ve failed to address the largest issue lack of content options. Without more channels/apps like Netflix (looking at you Hulu, HBO, etc) Apple TV ultimately suffers from limited usability unless you’re a big iTunes fan. While it’s fair that a good percentage of people looking at this device will have some content in iTunes, Apple simply cannot rely on that to support this product alone. Features like AirPlay are a welcome addition but likely aren’t enough. Especially considering that video playback is a bit choppy and mirroring, especially with games, has too much lag.

For me personally, I’m really only left with the AirPlay feature as a big feature. Which alone might be worth the price, especially if Apple can improve the performance. The content/channels/apps are, even objectively, poor. And the dependency on iTunes either running or being used for content purchases diminishes the utility of the media for me leaving the “Movies”, “TV Shows”, and “Music” features as empty. Yes it does everything the previous Apple TV did but better, but that’s also it’s flaw it doesn’t do anything new.

Pros:

++ Simple set up

++ Very pretty and smooth

++ AirPlay (for music and video)

+ 1080P

Cons:

-Very limited channels/content

-iTunes only for content, even for in network

iTunes match dependent for music

AirPlay lags and stutters a bit too much with mirroring and games

Things I’d like to see:

1) Support for network storage for content streaming. You can jailbreak and put plex or xmbc on to do this, but why do I have to?

2) More channels/apps. I’ve got all the missing channels on my iPad but why not on the Apple TV? Especially annoying since this is based off iOS 5 and has hardware better or on par with the original iPad.

3) Stronger AirPlay performance.

In the end it does really well at what it does (most of the time) but it’s a very shallow pool.

COMPARISON TO ROKU 2:

I also own a Roku 2 XS, so I figured I’d update with some remarks in comparison. The Apple TV is notably easier to set up. The Apple TV interface is also generally better, however certain apps (specifically looking at Netflix) while smoother on Apple TV are better laid out on Roku. Specifically with that, I mean Apple TV forces a text list strong interface at front whereas Roku shows you the box art. The remote on the Apple TV feels better but is more limited than Roku (Roku XS is RF as opposed to IR on Apple TV) and also lacks the instant replay (10 second) button found on the Roku XS very handy at times. Both are limited with text entry but have smartphone/tablet apps for use (although Apple Remote is only on iOS devices, whereas Roku Remote is on Android and iOS a point to note, but not likely a deal breaker). Image quality is comparable, Apple TV works better wirelessly than the Roku though (especially at start). While Apple’s interface is generally better/faster/smoother, it still ultimately lacks in content when compared to Roku. Roku has Pandora, HBO Go, Hulu, Amazon Instant, Crackle, and many other options. Aside from iTunes content (either from your computer or iTunes cloud for movies/tv or iTunes Match) there isn’t anything I’m aware of that Apple TV has that Roku does not. Apple TV does have AirPlay, which again makes it nice.

While Apple TV interface is generally better and smoother, the cost of the Roku (I got the XS for $80, so 20% less) and the instant replay button make it a better option for streaming. It’s not as refined but it offers the heavy hitters missing from Apple TV. Streaming options are just better with Roku.

Unless you own an iOS device or will be upgrading to Mountain Lion (for AirPlay) or are heavily invested in iTunes store purchases Roku is better hands down as Apple TV’s use will be very very limited. Conversely if you already own a gaming console or a TiVo or something similar then the streaming options of the Roku may not be unique (between my tivo, ps3, and 360 there isn’t a thing I use the roku for that I can’t do on one of those mainly the PS3). If you’re interested in a streaming device and don’t already own a gaming console, Roku is likely better. If you are only interested in Netflix, MLB, and NHL and/or you’re really in love with iTunes or AirPlay, then Apple TV is better.

Personally? I’m keeping the Apple TV, for AirPlay alone, hooked up to my TV in the living room. The Roku is going in my guest room. The Roku is a better device in my opinion, but it doesn’t do anything unique like AirPlay. Perfect on it’s own though where I don’t want to buy several devices again. Apple TV though is much much limited on its own though.

UPDATE:

I’ve tried other AirPlay games (Real Racing 2, NFS Shift 2) and the performance is better on these games. It’s still not what I’d expect or really want to deal with but it’s playable for sure. Lag/stuttering happens less often and when it does it’s less severe as compared to Asphalt 6. I’ll note as well that the performance doesn’t have an appreciable difference when the Apple TV is wireless vs wired, so it’s unclear what’s contributing to the lag. But the fact that some games are doable gives me hope for the future.

UPDATE 2:

Hulu was added Huzzah! We’re getting closer and closer.

I’d recently bought a MBA and have used the Apple TV for AirPlay when trying to show a video to someone. It works well but occasionally refuses to work correctly either the video is funny or there is no audio. Requires a restart of the MBA to get working (so it’s possible the error is on the MBA side).

All in all I still enjoy and use this device but it’s only used for AirPlay for me. If you don’t own other Apple products or don’t intend to use AirPlay I still say your money is better spent on an Roku. I’m still going to leave this as a 3 star review for me. Again it’s gained more features but not enough in my mind yet. It’s close to a 4 though, but the dependency on iTunes and other Apple devices to be anything unique keeps it down. Feels more like it’s supposed to be an accessory for Apple products, not a device to itself so much. Which is fine, but then I’d expect better performance.

Read Best Reviews of Apple TV MD199LL/A Here

With the release of Mountain Lion (OS X 10.8), the Mac has gained the ability to mirror screen content to the AppleTV. In my opinion, this flips the AppleTV from being a useful enough product to one whose flexibility and multitude of uses make it something you should own if you have any toehold into Apple’s ecosystem. At home, I have two of these–both this model and the previous 720p capable device–which I use in the more or less traditional mode of passive video watching coupled with daily use of Airplay to listen to podcasts or music streaming from my iPhone or iPad. At my last job, there was an AppleTV in the conference room, and employees could direct content to the big screen on the wall from their various Apple devices without the need of cabling up to a projector.

People often ask why an iPad doesn’t have an HDMI port. The AppleTV is the iPad’s HDMI port, and a better than wired one that allows you to maintain mobility while still projecting to the big screen.

As a media streamer, I’m happy with either the 2nd or 3rd generation AppleTV. I’ve cut the cord, no satellite or cable for my household, and whatever doesn’t come in from the antenna on the roof streams mainly through the AppleTV. We have other media streamers: a Roku XS, a smart TV, an IOMega Screenplay, and a couple of Blu-Ray players, but unless the content I want is on Amazon Instant Video or I’m taking advantage of a Vudu bargain, the go to streamer in the house is the Apple TV. My kids get around in it pretty easily, and they watch Netflix or content we’ve purchased from iTunes. The new HD content, both 1080p and 720p, supported by these devices is first rate, and while not quite at Blu-Ray quality is right up there with the gold standard Vudu HDX format. Be warned that your broadband connection might not be up to the demands of the new formats, I found I had to upgrade my service–I’m now at 30 Mbit download–in order to watch 1080p content without excessive buffering times. You can set the AppleTV to prefer the 720p stream if your network or TV isn’t up to 1080p. The content catalog is quite extensive when it comes to commercial, mainstream video, if you’re willing to pay.

Things aren’t perfect yet, with the arrival of Amazon Instant Video iPad app, you’d think you could make up for Amazon not being on the AppleTV, but Amazon (or their copyright holders) chose not to support video mirroring from the iPad. You can stream Amazon video from the selection of modern Macs capable of video mirroring–basically any model new since the middle of 2011–to the AppleTV, and it looks OK, a bit softer than if the AppleTV was doing the original decompression; as it is the mirrored Mac screen has to be captured, compressed in real time and decompressed again on the AppleTV. It’s serviceable, but I’ll be sticking with alternative devices with native Amazon support. And those digital downloads bundled with Blu-Ray disks and redeemed via iTunes do not bring the high definition version of the movie, but rather a disappointing widescreen version inferior to the corresponding HD iTunes version.

Energy efficiency is first rate, at around a Watt during playback and practically nothing when asleep. Compare and contrast with my typically noisy Intel based home theatre PC which draws 30 Watts all the time.

I had to set the device to require a password for purchasing content from iTunes, and to enter my password via the Remote app on my iPhone, as otherwise, my naughty children would have purchased every episode of Fairly Oddparents. Keep an eye out for discount iTunes gift cards occasionally found online.

As for the differences between the 2nd generation and 3rd generation models, they are identical both in appearance and except for the 1080p capability in functions. While the newer model has a faster processor, in practice, the interface is zippy fast on either with any slowness due to network problems. If you don’t have a 1080p TV, there is no reason not to stick with the 2nd generation, and even if you do, you might not notice a difference. Both have gigabit Ethernet ports, and I recommend using a wired connection to your router if it is at all feasible.

Apple is expanding the capabilities of the device, such as the addition of a Hulu+ app showed up on the launch screen. Hulu is an odd duck; a paid service with way too many ads, but semi-cheap at eight bucks a month–with an odd assortment of content which might not be available elsewhere, at least not at the price. After over a year of mainly Netflix, Amazon and iTunes, and a DVR for years before that, it’s a shock sitting through a 90 second commercial break. The service has a 7 day trial period, but I didn’t end up subscribing; for one thing because the shows I normally watch on Hulu, such as home improvement shows like Wasted Spaces, are not on Hulu+, but mainly because of the ads. Still anyone with an AppleTV in the U.S. should give it a try, just remember to immediately go to iTunes on the web and cancel auto-renewal.

Other services have been useful. As I don’t have access to ESPN, I’ve occasionally used the NBA app to watch game highlights. And my son has had an inordinate amount of enjoyment watching Minecraft run throughs on the YouTube app. I’ve even enjoyed the Flickr app displaying searches.

Maybe someday, you’ll be able to install arbitrary apps from the App Store, but I wouldn’t hold my breath on that. In the meantime, appreciate the AppleTV for what it is: a competitive media streamer and the world’s greatest HDMI cable.

Want Apple TV MD199LL/A Discount?

After spending a week with the new Apple TV I thought I would post a video review talking about it’s features.

TotalMount Apple TV Universal Mounting Kit

Save 3% Off

As the title hints, our household is already well furnished with Apple products. And as it has been said in other reviews in this thread, it will be a much more positive user experience for people who have Mac computers, or iPad / iPhone / iTouch, for these last three can be used as remote controls with an excellent free app (“Remote”) from Apple.

If it were not for Apple’s attention to detail, the installation of the Apple TV could be a bear for less technology-savvy consumers. But, even though I’ve installed a network or five before, in my mind this couldn’t have been easier. Opened up the package, plugged stuff up, and things came right up on the screen. Used the included remote to log in. It should be noted that logging in (This means you have to have an Apple ID login and password) must be done on all devices you plan on involving in what is essentially a kind of network parallel to the wi-fi network you have in your house (although of course it runs on it).

You must log in, and turn on Home Sharing, on the Apple TV, in iTunes on any computer you’re planning on using, and also on any iPad / iPhone / iTouch you’re using as a controller. It should also perhaps be noted that these logins are separate from logins and passwords you may be using for Netflix, Hulu, or any other media you are accessing through Apple TV. This all takes some time, but it’s a one-shot deal.

The nicest surprise (which I had not come across in my research) about the Apple TV is that it includes a high fidelity TOSLINK optical audio out connection in addition to the HDMI connector. The Sony receiver on our home stereo is rather old-school in that it predates HDMI, so we weren’t going to be able to run the Apple TV signal through that. Instead, I’d have to run the HDMI cable directly to our Samsung HDTV. However, the receiver does have TOSLINK inputs, so I just use a cable I had lying around, and I have excellent sound through our stereo speakers.

Once everything was up and running, I was very gratified by the far better picture and sound that I was getting compared to streaming Netflix through the Wii (which we have done for several years heretofore). I already knew that the Wii’s specs for picture and sound were pretty low, but for me, the increase in performance alone was worth the price of the Apple TV and cable.

Apple’s attention to the end user experience has always been one of the best features of owning their products, but the icing on the cake for Apple TV is the “Remote” app. Free, simple, and elegant. Once I used it, I knew I’d have to put the included remote in a safe place, because I wouldn’t be using it again except in some extraordinary circumstances.

There are some complaints in the reviews that the Apple TV lacks certain online media services. This may be the case, but for what it does provide, and for how it performs, we are very pleased.

Addendum: This Apple TV is just the gift that keeps on giving. I was under some misapprehensions about the capabilities of AirPlay, specifically AirPlay Mirroring. Google it, go to the Apple support page, and then do enough links. Photos and music may be displayed from your iDevice simultaneously through the Apple TV to your HDTV. Great!

Anne Klein Women’s 109442CHHY Gold-Tone Champagne Dial and Brown Leather Strap Watch

Anne Klein Women's 109442CHHY Gold-Tone Champagne Dial and Brown Leather Strap WatchBough this watch as a last minute stocking stuffer…with low expectations.

i was surprised t truly lovely it is and really pleased by the reaction!

It’s is a modest watch, price wise, but a real looker for the money.

Seems to work fine. I would give it 5 stars if I knew it would last a long time…but we’ll see.

My partner loved it and brags about it all the time.

Don’t you just love it when you get it right?

Got here very quickly. I love the face and design of this watch. It goes with everything but is still very feminine. It is defnitely a great buy for the price. I am very happy with my new Ann Klein watch!

Buy Anne Klein Women’s 109442CHHY Gold-Tone Champagne Dial and Brown Leather Strap Watch Now

I love this watch! It is a nice size and the champagne dial is very pretty. I was pleasantly surprised by the good quality and style available for the price.

Read Best Reviews of Anne Klein Women’s 109442CHHY Gold-Tone Champagne Dial and Brown Leather Strap Watch Here

I love shopping with Amazon! Everything was perfect: fast shipping time, super safe packaging, great communication.

Of course I expected this watch to be quite good, otherwise I wouldn’t have ordered it. However the result has overcome my best expectations! In real life the clock face isn’t so big. On photo it seemed a bit enormous for me. In reality it looks absolutely gorgeous. The combination of colors is very classic and elegant, and the quality is superb.

The only problem with me that it doesn’t exactly fit my wrist. If I put it through the first hole, it is too tight. And if I put it through the next one, it is hanging a bit. Maybe I have an irregular wrist size, LOL :)

In general I am very satisfied with the purchase. Highly recommended.

Want Anne Klein Women’s 109442CHHY Gold-Tone Champagne Dial and Brown Leather Strap Watch Discount?

Very cute and dainty. The watch fits my wrist well and matches most of my clothing. I have owned this for a few months now and I do not have any scratches or wear of the brown leather band. Good Buy.

SE Self Locking Bag 2MIL (500 PK)

SE Self Locking Bag 2MIL, 2in X 3inI purchased two sets (1000 bags) of this product. My need is to package sorted board game counters and maintain the current sort. Over 10,000 counters; needing at least 800 to 1000 bags. I have worked through 500+ bags.

So far, the quality rate is 100%. That’s correct, 100%. Not one single bag out of 500+ has been a failed bag.

These bags are very well made, and easy to use. At the top, there is an overlap of the plastic on one side, making the top portion easy to separate. Given that these are soft plastic products, I did flex the zipper part back and forth to break any stick that might have been present. All bags opened just fine with no more than the expected force needed to break the seal. All bags resealed perfectly.

I can recommend these bags without reservation.

These bags are perfect for keeping any jewelry you sell in order. I’ve used them for a few months and have been quite impressed by the quality.

Buy SE Self Locking Bag 2MIL (500 PK) Now

I work with electronics a lot and have numerous components.

I used to keep them in their original packaging but they ended up taking to much space.

Using these bags I reduced my entire inventory of parts down to a single freezer bag instead of several drawers because of the bulky packaging.

Note to buyers: These bags are a bit thin and can tear if you try to force the zipper apart.

When you open the bag, rather than trying to pull the zipper apart, roll your fingers as if you’re trying to “peel” the bag open.

After all, the whole function of the zipper is to prevent you from pulling apart. Trying to muscle it apart will only tear it.

Read Best Reviews of SE Self Locking Bag 2MIL (500 PK) Here

The bags came in 3 separate bags (not 4 as pictured but no big deal, it’s just the packaging) in a much bigger bag.

The individual little zipper bags are not exactly 2″x3″ … it is 1 7/8″ x 3″ … and the inside measurement (inside the zipped area) is barely 1 7/8″ x 2 3/4″ …. so much smaller than what I need. The ‘zipper’ is not very easy to open which is not a bad thing if you want things to stay inside, but because of its size, it is a consideration if you are taking items in/out of these bags. Perhaps it’s difficult because there is only 1/4″ of plastic to grasp to open the bag. The thickness is like a Ziplock snacksize bag, maybe a tad thicker. Keeping it just because there has got to be other uses for this and it’s cheap enough. Just getting a larger size one next.

Want SE Self Locking Bag 2MIL (500 PK) Discount?

I’ve bought “these” bags a few times. The ones from ‘hobbytoolsupply’ (shipped direct) are nice quality and thickness, just like you would expect if you bought 2 mil zipper bags from a grocery store. They almost feel like freezer bag thickness. They open and close easily. Five (out of five) stars.

The ones from ‘TOYS, HOBBIES & MORE, LLC’ (shipped direct from Amazon) are very poor quality. They’re about the thickness of plastic cling wrap. Definitely NOT 2 mil maybe not even 1 mil. You have to slide the zipper to pop it open, and then blow air into the bag to get the plastic to separate. The zipper is quite thin as well, so it takes longer to close them. These are not bags I would keep for my own use, only as shipping bags for customers (and for them to throw away). Two stars.

Save 28% Off